JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 22, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Daniel Giovanny Neira Rios

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Cumplimiento De Sentencia De Tutela E Incidente De Desacato
  • Competencia excepcional de la Corte Constitucional
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela E Incidente De Desacato
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de apertura de incidente de desacato.

El peticionario adujo el incumplimiento de las órdenes emitidas por la Corte Constitucional en la Sentencia T-698/13.

La Sala advierte que en el presente caso no existe necesidad de que la Corporación directamente adopte la tramitación del incidente de desacato para lograr el cumplimiento de la providencia referenciada y, en tal sentido, dispone remitir la petición al juez de primera instancia, esto es, la Sección Quinta del Consejo de Estado, para que adopte las medidas que estime pertinentes.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Por Secretaría General de esta Corporación, REMITIR a la Sección Quinta del Consejo de Estado -juez de primera instancia-, la solicitud presentada por Daniel Geovany Neira Ríos, para que adopte las medidas que estime pertinente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.